Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 48.1 to 27.1.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Granite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.429.7
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13121039
LMArena WebDev1192—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12931028

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math13121089

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1309984

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12611000
LMArena Chinese13371016
LMArena Russian12401004
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12691023

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1275996

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text12901050
LMArena Creative Writing12511024
LMArena Multi-Turn1268989

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.1 8b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper