Model comparison
Granite 4.1 8b vs Magistral Small
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 25.7 to 6.8.
Side by side
| Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Magistral Small leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | — |
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
Math Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | — |
Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Magistral Small?
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.1 8b or Magistral Small better for coding?
Magistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Magistral Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.