Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

36.8

Rank #202 Confirmed

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.0 to 24.6.
  • Granite 4.1 8b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Grok 4.5 specifications
Granite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index36.855.0
Released—2026-07-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1352

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.5 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), Grok 4.5: 51.7 (#34)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena WebDev11901552
LMArena Coding13131473
DeepSWE—53.8%
FrontierCode—42.4%
SciCode—54.1%
WeirdML—46.4%
ALE-Bench—1,309

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#15)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
APEX-Agents—56.2%
τ²-bench Banking—47.9%
PostTrainBench—23.4%
GBAEval—65.4%
GDP.pdf—14%
LMArena Search—1213
Vending-Bench 2—3,887

Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), Grok 4.5: 56.0 (#23)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena Hard Prompts12941462
ARC-AGI-2—52.6%
SimpleBench—70%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—83.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.9%
ARC-AGI-1—87.2%
CritPt—15.4%
Chess Puzzles—36%
DTBench—96.5%
LMCA—45.2%
Surface Evolver Bench—74.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.02

Math Grok 4.5 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), Grok 4.5: 60.7 (#29)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena Math13111457
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—24.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.8%
ProofBench—31%

Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena Expert13101466
GPQA Diamond—93.4%
SimpleQA Verified—48.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Grok 4.5: 37.8 (#63)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena Vision—1287
Blueprint-Bench 2—27.3%
Furniture Assembly—22.5%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), Grok 4.5: 54.5 (#43)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena Non-English12611439
LMArena Chinese13351497
LMArena Russian12381447
LMArena French—1458
LMArena German—1448
LMArena Japanese—1425
LMArena Korean—1402
LMArena Spanish—1452

Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), Grok 4.5: 76.3 (#45)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena Instruction Following12681446

Long Context Grok 4.5 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#54)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena Longer Query12751463

Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), Grok 4.5: 65.9 (#40)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bGrok 4.5
LMArena Text12911448
LMArena Creative Writing12491442
LMArena Multi-Turn12691457
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1579

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 36.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.7 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Grok 4.5 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper