Model comparison

Granite 4.1 30B vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 has enough public results to be ranked (#15); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 30B IBM

34.0

Unranked Sparse

Kimi K3 Moonshot AI

59.5

Rank #15 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 30B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K3 in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K3 leads 63.0 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.8% for Granite 4.1 30B and 59.5% for Kimi K3.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 30B and Kimi K3 specifications
Granite 4.1 30BKimi K3
ProviderIBMMoonshot AI
Noometry Index34.059.5
Released2026-04-292026-07-16
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$3
Output $ / M tokens—$15
Results tracked253

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 30B: 35.2, Kimi K3: 61.0 (#10)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
SciCode25.8%59.5%
DeepSWE—68.5%
FrontierCode—44.2%
LMArena WebDev—1654
FrontierSWE—25.9%
WeirdML—82.6%
LMArena Coding—1508
ALE-Bench—1,524

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Kimi K3: 41.8 (#20)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
APEX-Agents—50.6%
τ²-bench Banking—37.1%
PostTrainBench—32%
GBAEval—48.3%
GDP.pdf—19%
Vending-Bench 2—5,165

Reasoning Kimi K3 leads

Granite 4.1 30B: 22.4, Kimi K3: 63.0 (#17)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
CritPt0%23.4%
ARC-AGI-2—60.4%
SimpleBench—60.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—93.6%
ARC-AGI-1—94.5%
Chess Puzzles—39%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—26%
DTBench—91.2%
LMCA—52.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Epoch Capabilities Index—157.45
ForecastBench—61.1

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Kimi K3: 74.2 (#16)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—72.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—39%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—97.2%
ProofBench—87%
LMArena Math—1491

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Kimi K3: 63.2 (#21)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
GPQA Diamond—93.1%
SimpleQA Verified—50.6%
LMArena Expert—1521

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Kimi K3: 37.8 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
Blueprint-Bench 2—29.5%
Furniture Assembly—34.2%

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Kimi K3: 56.3 (#21)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
LMArena Non-English—1466
LMArena Chinese—1529
LMArena French—1491
LMArena German—1488
LMArena Japanese—1487
LMArena Korean—1458
LMArena Russian—1482
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Kimi K3: 77.7 (#14)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
LMArena Instruction Following—1483

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Kimi K3: 45.8 (#29)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
LMArena Longer Query—1494

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Granite 4.1 30B: —, Kimi K3: 76.6 (#4)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 30BKimi K3
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1454
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2082
EQ-Bench 4—1339
LMArena Multi-Turn—1488

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 30B better than Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 has enough public results to be ranked (#15); Granite 4.1 30B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Granite 4.1 30B or Kimi K3 better for coding?

Kimi K3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 61.0 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 30B and Kimi K3 share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 30B has 2 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K3 has 53.

Related comparisons

Go deeper