Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Qwen2-72B

Granite 4.0 Micro and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

29.0

Rank #318 Confirmed

Qwen2-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.0

Rank #300 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Granite 4.0 Micro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen2-72B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2-72B leads 30.2 to 12.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 28.3% for Granite 4.0 Micro and 40.8% for Qwen2-72B.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and Qwen2-72B specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.030.0
Released2025-10-022024-06-07
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.017—
Output $ / M tokens$0.11—
Results tracked826

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen2-72B: 29.1 (#310)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
WeirdML—11.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.5%
LMArena Coding—1196
BigCodeBench Complete—54%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen2-72B: 17.0 (#146)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
TheAgentCompany—1.1%
METR Time Horizons—29.9%

Reasoning Qwen2-72B leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Qwen2-72B: 23.2 (#181)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1191
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.28

Math Qwen2-72B leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Qwen2-72B: 30.2 (#236)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%—
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1235
MATH Level 5—39.1%

Knowledge Qwen2-72B leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#275)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
GPQA Diamond28.3%40.8%
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—
LMArena Expert—1171
MMLU—82.4%

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen2-72B: 35.9 (#244)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
LMArena Non-English—1176
LMArena Chinese—1240
LMArena French—1170
LMArena German—1151
LMArena Japanese—1111
LMArena Korean—1083
LMArena Russian—1169
LMArena Spanish—1169

Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Qwen2-72B: 61.7 (#241)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1181

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
LMArena Longer Query—1192

Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 Micro leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Qwen2-72B: 40.8 (#241)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroQwen2-72B
LMArena Text—1203
LMArena Creative Writing—1181
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1196

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Qwen2-72B?

Granite 4.0 Micro and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.0 vs 30.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Qwen2-72B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.

Related comparisons

Go deeper