Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.0 to 9.9.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 37.3 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 18.5 (#261), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 11.2 (#301), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#299), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 70.0 (#164), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1246 |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#212), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.