Model comparison

Granite 4.0 Micro vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.0 Micro IBM

29.0

Rank #318 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 40.8 to 9.9.
  • Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper at $0.017 / $0.11 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.5.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.0 Micro and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
Granite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index29.043.4
Released2025-10-022026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K1.05M
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.017$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$0.11$0.28
Results tracked823

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
LMArena WebDev—1438
SciCode—43.1%
LMArena Coding—1469
ALE-Bench—513.95

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1450

Math MiMo-V2.5 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20252.8%—
ProofBench—16%
Omni-MATH20.9%—
LMArena Math—1436

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
GPQA Diamond28.3%—
MMLU-Pro39.5%—
GPQA (HELM)30.7%—
LMArena Expert—1460

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English—1404
LMArena Chinese—1468
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1421
LMArena Japanese—1306
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Russian—1395
LMArena Spanish—1416

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
IFEval84.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1434

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 4.0 Micro: —, MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query—1445

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads

Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text—1428
LMArena Creative Writing—1393
WildBench67%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1445

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index. Granite 4.0 Micro costs 4.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or MiMo-V2.5?

Granite 4.0 Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.11 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5 lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and MiMo-V2.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper