Model comparison
Granite 4.0 Micro vs Llama 13b
Granite 4.0 Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 Micro leads 69.9 to 36.7.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 29.0 | 24.4 |
| Released | 2025-10-02 | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.017 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.11 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 19.2 (#265), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Llama 13b leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 12.0 (#307), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 20.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: 9.9 (#304), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 28.3% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 39.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.7% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.0 Micro: —, Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 69.9 (#169), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 84.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 Micro leads
Granite 4.0 Micro: 46.7 (#216), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 Micro | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| WildBench | 67% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Llama 13b?
Granite 4.0 Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.0 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 Micro and Llama 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 Micro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.