Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Yi-Lightning

Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Yi-Lightning 01.AI

37.1

Rank #209 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Yi-Lightning in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-Lightning leads 50.2 to 35.5.
  • Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Yi-Lightning specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
ProviderIBM01.AI
Noometry Index32.437.1
Released—2024-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1318

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Yi-Lightning: 27.4 (#320)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
LMArena Coding11861312
Aider Polyglot—12.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Yi-Lightning: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Yi-Lightning leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Yi-Lightning: 25.9 (#139)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
LMArena Hard Prompts11451302

Math Yi-Lightning leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Yi-Lightning: 36.2 (#172)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
LMArena Math11521300

Knowledge Yi-Lightning leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Yi-Lightning: 35.4 (#185)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
LMArena Expert11421286

Multilingual Yi-Lightning leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Yi-Lightning: 42.2 (#196)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
LMArena Non-English10991269
LMArena Chinese11451320
LMArena Russian10921255
LMArena French—1305
LMArena German—1267
LMArena Japanese—1228
LMArena Korean—1192
LMArena Spanish—1315

Instruction Following Yi-Lightning leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Yi-Lightning: 67.4 (#196)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
LMArena Instruction Following11311278

Long Context Yi-Lightning leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#181)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
LMArena Longer Query11621297

Writing & Preference Yi-Lightning leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Yi-Lightning: 50.2 (#184)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-Lightning
LMArena Text11501302
LMArena Creative Writing11291280
LMArena Multi-Turn11081311

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Yi-Lightning?

Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Yi-Lightning better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Yi-Lightning share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper