Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Yi-34B

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 31.1 to 7.5.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Yi-34B specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
ProviderIBM01.AI
Noometry Index32.427.8
Released—2023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1323

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Coding11861112

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts11451104
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—117.39

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Math11521114
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Expert11421061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Non-English10991079
LMArena Chinese11451176
LMArena Russian10921050
LMArena French—1081
LMArena German—1042
LMArena Japanese—993
LMArena Korean—959
LMArena Spanish—1070

Instruction Following Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following11311091

Long Context Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query11621094

Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Text11501129
LMArena Creative Writing11291108
LMArena Multi-Turn11081113

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Yi-34B?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Yi-34B better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Yi-34B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper