Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Qwen3-4B

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #261 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-4B in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen3-4B leads 27.3 to 23.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 27.1% for Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and 35.7% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3-4B specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.831.5
Released—2025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked136

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Coding1186—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-4B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%35.7%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1146—

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
LMArena Math1152—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond—52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1142—

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1099—
LMArena Chinese1145—
LMArena Russian1092—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1131—

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1162—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1150—
LMArena Creative Writing1129—
LMArena Multi-Turn1108—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Qwen3-4B?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3-4B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.8 vs 31.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3-4B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper