Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Qwen3 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 235B-A22B leads 59.6 to 35.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 27.1% for Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and 52.1% for Qwen3 235B-A22B.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3 235B-A22B specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.443.5
Released—2025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked1349

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 44.3 (#75)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding11861445
Aider Polyglot—59.6%
SciCode—42.4%
WeirdML—41%

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.9 (#51)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%52.1%
Vending-Bench 2—-11.34

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.7 (#311)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts11451433
ARC-AGI-2—1.3%
SimpleBench—31%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—69.4%
ARC-AGI-1—11%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—29.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.85
ForecastBench—59.7

Math Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 50.4 (#57)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Math11521432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
Omni-MATH—71.8%
MATH Level 5—68.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.6 (#73)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Expert11421463
GPQA Diamond—80.1%
SimpleQA Verified—40.4%
MMLU-Pro—84.4%
Confabulations—15.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%

Multilingual Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.3 (#89)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English10991409
LMArena Chinese11451481
LMArena Russian10921411
LMArena French—1445
LMArena German—1433
LMArena Japanese—1399
LMArena Korean—1391
LMArena Spanish—1430

Instruction Following Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.6 (#136)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following11311408
IFEval—83.5%

Long Context Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#26)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query11621426
Fiction.LiveBench—75%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.6 (#108)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructQwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Text11501419
LMArena Creative Writing11291384
LMArena Multi-Turn11081432
Short-Story Creative Writing—83%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1366
WildBench—86.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper