Model comparison
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Pixtral Large
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Pixtral Large score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISide by side
| Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1145 | — |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | — |
Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Pixtral Large?
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Pixtral Large score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.4 vs 32.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.