Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs o1-mini

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

33.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1-mini leads 48.6 to 35.7.
  • Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and o1-mini specifications
Granite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
ProviderIBMOpenAI
Noometry Index31.833.7
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Coding11861362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts11461333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Math11521358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Expert11421316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multilingual o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Non-English10991289
LMArena Chinese11451314
LMArena Russian10921283
LMArena French—1292
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Spanish—1302

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following11311304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Longer Query11621321

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Text11501317
LMArena Creative Writing11291244
LMArena Multi-Turn11081314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than o1-mini?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and o1-mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper