Model comparison
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Llama 3.2 11B
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#256); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Llama 3.2 11B leads 27.0 to 23.9.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 31.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.2 11B leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Llama 3.2 11B: 27.0
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |
| BALROG | — | 16.8% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1146 | — |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | — |
| MMLU | — | 56.5% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —, Llama 3.2 11B: 23.8
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 966 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Llama 3.2 11B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Llama 3.2 11B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Llama 3.2 11B?
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#256); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama 3.2 11B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 11B has 3.