Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Llama 3.2 11B

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#256); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 11B Meta

31.6

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Llama 3.2 11B leads 27.0 to 23.9.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama 3.2 11B specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index31.831.6
Released—2024-09-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Coding1186—

Agentic & Tool Use Llama 3.2 11B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Llama 3.2 11B: 27.0

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—
BALROG—16.8%

Reasoning Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Hard Prompts1146—

Math Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Math1152—

Knowledge Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Expert1142—
MMLU—56.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —, Llama 3.2 11B: 23.8

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Vision—966

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Non-English1099—
LMArena Chinese1145—
LMArena Russian1092—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Instruction Following1131—

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Longer Query1162—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Llama 3.2 11B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.2 11B
LMArena Text1150—
LMArena Creative Writing1129—
LMArena Multi-Turn1108—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Llama 3.2 11B?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#256); Llama 3.2 11B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama 3.2 11B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 11B has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper