Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Llama 3.1-70B

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-70B Meta

29.6

Rank #308 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 33.0 to 13.5.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama 3.1-70B specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index32.429.6
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1335

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Coding11861260
WeirdML—9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—
TheAgentCompany—6.9%
BALROG—27.9%

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts11451241
DTBench—60%
LMCA—14.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.92

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Math11521252
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.6%
Omni-MATH—21%
MATH Level 5—36.7%

Knowledge Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Expert11421209
GPQA Diamond—44.2%
MMLU-Pro—65.3%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
MMLU—80.1%

Multilingual Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Non-English10991219
LMArena Chinese11451215
LMArena Russian10921234
LMArena French—1261
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1132
LMArena Korean—1140
LMArena Spanish—1253

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Instruction Following11311231
IFEval—82.1%

Long Context Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Longer Query11621241

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Text11501261
LMArena Creative Writing11291232
LMArena Multi-Turn11081256
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—784
WildBench—75.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Llama 3.1-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper