Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling-Small leads 59.6 to 35.5.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Inkling-Small specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
ProviderIBMThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index32.446.5
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Coding11861451
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Inkling-Small: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts11451423
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.15

Math Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Math11521459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Expert11421442
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: —, Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Non-English10991402
LMArena Chinese11451465
LMArena Russian10921391
LMArena French—1436
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Spanish—1428

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following11311399

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query11621401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling-Small
LMArena Text11501414
LMArena Creative Writing11291331
LMArena Multi-Turn11081418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Inkling-Small share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper