Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Inkling

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

32.4

Rank #258 Confirmed

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Inkling in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling leads 65.2 to 35.5.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Inkling specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
ProviderIBMThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index32.444.1
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—66K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.87
Output $ / M tokens—$4.68
Results tracked1341

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Inkling: 34.5 (#234)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
LMArena Coding11861464
FrontierCode—14%
LMArena WebDev—1413
FrontierSWE—4.1%
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—32.3%
ALE-Bench—946

Agentic & Tool Use Inkling leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Inkling: 29.6 (#85)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
APEX-Agents—33.8%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—
τ²-bench Banking—25%

Reasoning Inkling leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Inkling: 40.4 (#56)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
LMArena Hard Prompts11451451
ARC-AGI-2—36.5%
SimpleBench—50%
ARC-AGI-1—79.5%
CritPt—5.4%
Chess Puzzles—21%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—148.54

Math Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Inkling: 31.3 (#225)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
LMArena Math11521479
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—4.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—0%

Knowledge Inkling leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Inkling: 55.1 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
LMArena Expert11421465
GPQA Diamond—88.3%
SimpleQA Verified—40.3%

Multilingual Inkling leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Inkling: 54.0 (#52)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
LMArena Non-English10991434
LMArena Chinese11451490
LMArena Russian10921429
LMArena French—1458
LMArena German—1446
LMArena Japanese—1429
LMArena Korean—1404
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Inkling: 75.1 (#71)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
LMArena Instruction Following11311426

Long Context Inkling leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Inkling: 43.8 (#86)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
LMArena Longer Query11621434

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Inkling: 65.2 (#51)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructInkling
LMArena Text11501441
LMArena Creative Writing11291387
LMArena Multi-Turn11081436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1611
EQ-Bench 4—1226

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Inkling better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (34.5 vs 34.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Inkling share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper