Model comparison

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Grok-3 mini

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct IBM

31.8

Rank #256 Confirmed

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.0

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Grok-3 mini leads 78.7 to 58.9.
  • Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Grok-3 mini specifications
Granite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index31.841.0
Released—2025-04-09
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1335

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232), Grok-3 mini: 40.4 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Coding11861380
Aider Polyglot—49.3%
WeirdML—42.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113), Grok-3 mini: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204), Grok-3 mini: 13.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Hard Prompts11461374
ARC-AGI-2—0.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—61.3%
ARC-AGI-1—16.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.35

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210), Grok-3 mini: 40.3 (#78)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Math11521386
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—77.8%
Omni-MATH—31.8%
MATH Level 5—90.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—5.9%

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218), Grok-3 mini: 46.3 (#75)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Expert11421395
GPQA Diamond—76.3%
MMLU-Pro—79.9%
Confabulations—10.8%
GPQA (HELM)—67.5%

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255), Grok-3 mini: 48.3 (#141)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Non-English10991352
LMArena Chinese11451387
LMArena Russian10921352
LMArena French—1357
LMArena German—1350
LMArena Japanese—1343
LMArena Korean—1336
LMArena Spanish—1379

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254), Grok-3 mini: 78.7 (#8)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Instruction Following11311356
IFEval—95.1%

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236), Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#142)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Longer Query11621372
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261), Grok-3 mini: 52.7 (#163)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 8b InstructGrok-3 mini
LMArena Text11501370
LMArena Creative Writing11291342
LMArena Multi-Turn11081355
Short-Story Creative Writing—73.5%
WildBench—65.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Grok-3 mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper