Model comparison
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs StarCoder 2 7B
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#247); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASide by side
| Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 37.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding StarCoder 2 7B leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.8
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 27.7% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 29.9% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 93.56 |
| WinoGrande | — | 57.1% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 32.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 38.7% |
| MMLU | — | 38.8% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), StarCoder 2 7B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | StarCoder 2 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than StarCoder 2 7B?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#247); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?
StarCoder 2 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.8 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and StarCoder 2 7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.