Noometry

Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5

Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 NVIDIA

40.3

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads 53.1 to 34.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index33.240.3
Released—2025-07-25
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1212

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 39.8 (#154)

BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Coding11491355

Reasoning Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 26.8 (#128)

BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Hard Prompts11381336

Math Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 38.2 (#141)

BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Math11591392

Knowledge Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 36.7 (#165)

BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Expert11311330

Multilingual Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 45.5 (#168)

BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Non-English10681316
LMArena Russian10631332
LMArena Chinese1139—
LMArena Japanese—1300

Instruction Following Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 68.6 (#188)

BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Instruction Following11161299

Long Context Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 40.0 (#164)

BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Longer Query11551315

Writing & Preference Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5: 53.1 (#159)

BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5
LMArena Text11271338
LMArena Creative Writing11161307
LMArena Multi-Turn10991334

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5?

Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 better for coding?

Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Nvidia Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49b v1.5 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper