Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Nova 2 Lite

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nova 2 Lite in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova 2 Lite leads 53.9 to 34.1.
  • Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Nova 2 Lite specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
ProviderIBMAmazon
Noometry Index33.239.7
Released—2025-12-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
LMArena Coding11491385

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —, Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.1%

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
LMArena Hard Prompts11381364

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
LMArena Math11591359

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
LMArena Expert11311358
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%

Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
LMArena Non-English10681337
LMArena Chinese11391364
LMArena Russian10631343
LMArena French—1381
LMArena German—1343
LMArena Japanese—1271
LMArena Korean—1284
LMArena Spanish—1373

Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
LMArena Instruction Following11161335

Long Context Nova 2 Lite leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
LMArena Longer Query11551335

Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNova 2 Lite
LMArena Text11271362
LMArena Creative Writing11161291
LMArena Multi-Turn10991338

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Nova 2 Lite?

Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Nova 2 Lite better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Nova 2 Lite share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper