Model comparison

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct IBM

33.2

Rank #247 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 37.9 to 29.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Granite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index33.235.9
Released—2024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding11491209

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts11381202

Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math11591216

Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert11311171

Multilingual Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10681206
LMArena Chinese11391214
LMArena Russian10631219
LMArena French—1197
LMArena German—1192
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following11161203

Long Context Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query11551225

Writing & Preference Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.1 2b InstructNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text11271225
LMArena Creative Writing11161203
LMArena Multi-Turn10991214

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper