Model comparison
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct vs Llama 2-13B
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 22.0 to 12.8.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 33.2 | 29.6 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1149 | 1062 |
Reasoning Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1138 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1159 | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1131 | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: —, Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1068 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1139 | 1001 |
| LMArena Russian | 1063 | 1055 |
| LMArena French | — | 1044 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1087 |
Instruction Following Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | 1045 |
Long Context Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1155 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1127 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1116 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1099 | 1050 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better than Llama 2-13B?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 3.1 2b Instruct or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 2b Instruct and Llama 2-13B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.