Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.0

Rank #123 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 57.9 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.642.0
Released—2026-02-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1428

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Coding11121410
LMArena WebDev—1254
SciCode—29.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts10921400
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—10%
DTBench—80%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.52

Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Math11431404
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Expert10871408
GPQA Diamond—83.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multilingual Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English10371378
LMArena Chinese10631457
LMArena Russian10601376
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Spanish—1392

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following10881379

Long Context Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query11221389

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text10961395
LMArena Creative Writing10711346
LMArena Multi-Turn10631390

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.8 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper