Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

28.6

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 30.3 to 11.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 35.4% for Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and 46.1% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.128.6
Released—2024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.17
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked1415

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%37.6%
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%46.1%
LMArena Coding1113—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
BALROG—7.8%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1092—
DTBench—47.7%
LMCA—6.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.44

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—2.5%
Omni-MATH—29.4%
LMArena Math1143—

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—35.5%
MMLU-Pro—53.9%
GPQA (HELM)—34.1%
LMArena Expert1087—
MMLU—72.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1037—
LMArena Chinese1063—
LMArena Russian1060—

Instruction Following Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
IFEval—74.1%
LMArena Instruction Following1088—

Long Context Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1122—

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructQwen2.5 7B Instruct
LMArena Text1096—
LMArena Creative Writing1071—
WildBench—73.1%
LMArena Multi-Turn1063—

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.1 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper