Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 29.6.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Muse Spark specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index31.650.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Coding11121481
SciCode—51.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts10921474
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Math11431455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Expert10871457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English10371464
LMArena Chinese10631509
LMArena Russian10601466
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following10881442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query11221451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Text10961474
LMArena Creative Writing10711459
LMArena Multi-Turn10631477

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Muse Spark share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper