Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.5

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.5 Mistral AI

39.6

Rank #151 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.5 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.5 leads 58.6 to 31.2.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index31.139.6
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—210K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1422

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297), Mistral Medium 3.5: 35.7 (#208)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Coding11131461
LMArena WebDev—1263
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227), Mistral Medium 3.5: 16.6 (#290)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10921436
Kagi LLM Benchmark—41.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—12.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.42

Math Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211), Mistral Medium 3.5: 36.4 (#113)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Math11431432

Knowledge Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233), Mistral Medium 3.5: 39.3 (#123)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Expert10871431

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, Mistral Medium 3.5: 37.6 (#64)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Vision—1222

Multilingual Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271), Mistral Medium 3.5: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Non-English10371405
LMArena Chinese10631443
LMArena Russian10601396
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1453
LMArena Korean—1387
LMArena Spanish—1406

Instruction Following Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271), Mistral Medium 3.5: 74.7 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Instruction Following10881414

Long Context Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247), Mistral Medium 3.5: 43.2 (#101)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Longer Query11221414

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.5 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280), Mistral Medium 3.5: 58.6 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMistral Medium 3.5
LMArena Text10961421
LMArena Creative Writing10711372
LMArena Multi-Turn10631423
EQ-Bench 4—993

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Mistral Medium 3.5?

Mistral Medium 3.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Mistral Medium 3.5 better for coding?

Mistral Medium 3.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.7 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Mistral Medium 3.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.5 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper