Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5-Pro Xiaomi

45.2

Rank #74 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 65.3 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
ProviderIBMXiaomi
Noometry Index31.645.2
Released—2026-04-22
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.4 (#60)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Coding11121503
LMArena WebDev—1479
SciCode—50.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—
ALE-Bench—899.8

Reasoning MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 26.8 (#130)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts10921488
NYT Connections (extended)—34.4%
CritPt—4%
DTBench—84.5%
LMCA—29.5%

Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 40.0 (#96)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Math11431481
ProofBench—22%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 42.2 (#98)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Expert10871503

Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.1 (#34)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Non-English10371449
LMArena Chinese10631507
LMArena Russian10601450
LMArena French—1488
LMArena German—1458
LMArena Japanese—1412
LMArena Korean—1437
LMArena Spanish—1471

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.5 (#21)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following10881477

Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#37)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Longer Query11221483

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.3 (#49)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiMo-V2.5-Pro
LMArena Text10961465
LMArena Creative Writing10711440
LMArena Multi-Turn10631477
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1493
EQ-Bench 4—1208

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.2 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.4 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper