Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs Grok 4.1

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 xAI

40.8

Rank #135 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.1 leads 62.6 to 31.2.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Grok 4.1 specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index31.140.8
Released—2025-11-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1419

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.1 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297), Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
LMArena Coding11131445
LMArena WebDev—1214
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
Cybench—39%

Reasoning Grok 4.1 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227), Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
LMArena Hard Prompts10921436

Math Grok 4.1 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211), Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
LMArena Math11431422

Knowledge Grok 4.1 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233), Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
LMArena Expert10871417

Multilingual Grok 4.1 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271), Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
LMArena Non-English10371425
LMArena Chinese10631464
LMArena Russian10601434
LMArena French—1448
LMArena German—1447
LMArena Japanese—1396
LMArena Korean—1407
LMArena Spanish—1438

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271), Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
LMArena Instruction Following10881400

Long Context Grok 4.1 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247), Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
LMArena Longer Query11221416

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280), Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructGrok 4.1
LMArena Text10961437
LMArena Creative Writing10711411
LMArena Multi-Turn10631438

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than Grok 4.1?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 31.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

Grok 4.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and Grok 4.1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper