Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 29.6.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Max Preview specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.845.3
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding10901487
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts10731483

Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math11171474

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert10641489

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English10331465
LMArena Chinese10701534
LMArena Russian10451471
LMArena French—1484
LMArena German—1487
LMArena Japanese—1495
LMArena Korean—1438
LMArena Spanish—1470

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following10561467

Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query10701476

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text10801470
LMArena Creative Writing10461464
LMArena Multi-Turn10531478

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper