Model comparison
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-7B
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 4 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 32.2 to 28.3.
Side by side
| Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-7B leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1107 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1065 |
Math Too close to call
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1080 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-7B leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | 1006 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1058 |
Long Context Too close to call
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1070 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-7B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.