Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-72B

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-72B Alibaba (Qwen)

30.8

Rank #285 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-72B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 29.0 to 11.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and 33.2% for Qwen1.5-72B.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.830.8
Released—2024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1322

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen1.5-72B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%33.2%
LMArena Coding10901165
BigCodeBench Complete—40.3%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—61.6%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-72B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Hard Prompts10731148

Math Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Math11171164

Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Expert10641136
GPQA Diamond—28.8%

Multilingual Qwen1.5-72B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Non-English10331135
LMArena Chinese10701186
LMArena Russian10451104
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1084
LMArena Japanese—1061
LMArena Korean—1050
LMArena Spanish—1110

Instruction Following Qwen1.5-72B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Instruction Following10561141

Long Context Qwen1.5-72B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Longer Query10701157

Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-72B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructQwen1.5-72B
LMArena Text10801166
LMArena Creative Writing10461137
LMArena Multi-Turn10531160

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-72B?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Qwen1.5-72B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper