Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Phi-4

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Phi-4 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 32.2 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and 45.5% for Phi-4.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi-4 specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.831.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi-4 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%45.5%
LMArena Coding10901231
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts10731220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Math11171246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Phi-4 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Expert10641203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Phi-4 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Non-English10331197
LMArena Chinese10701212
LMArena Russian10451209
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Phi-4 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following10561201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Phi-4 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query10701217

Writing & Preference Phi-4 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi-4
LMArena Text10801217
LMArena Creative Writing10461182
LMArena Multi-Turn10531206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Phi-4?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi-4 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Phi-4 better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi-4 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper