Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 4 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 20.5 to 14.8.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.829.3
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1332

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding10901101
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731100
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math11171151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert10641067
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10331058
LMArena Chinese10701061
LMArena Russian10451111
LMArena French—1135
LMArena German—1080
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10561087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10701088

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text10801110
LMArena Creative Writing10461083
LMArena Multi-Turn10531068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.3 vs 27.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper