Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

33.0

Rank #250 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 32.9 to 28.3.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.833.0
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding10901130
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731127

Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Math11171173

Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert10641108

Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English10331094
LMArena Chinese10701108
LMArena Russian10451145
LMArena French—1110
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10561113

Long Context Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10701120

Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text10801138
LMArena Creative Writing10461107
LMArena Multi-Turn10531088

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper