Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs o1-mini

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and o1-mini in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o1-mini leads 48.4 to 29.6.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and o1-mini specifications
Granite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
ProviderIBMOpenAI
Noometry Index30.834.0
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Coding10901362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
WeirdML—36.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—
LiveBench Coding—48%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
Cybench—10%

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10731333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math o1-mini leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Math11171358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge o1-mini leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Expert10641316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%

Multilingual o1-mini leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Non-English10331289
LMArena Chinese10701314
LMArena Russian10451283
LMArena French—1293
LMArena German—1278
LMArena Japanese—1245
LMArena Korean—1223
LMArena Spanish—1303

Instruction Following o1-mini leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following10561304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context o1-mini leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Longer Query10701320

Writing & Preference o1-mini leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b Instructo1-mini
LMArena Text10801317
LMArena Creative Writing10461244
LMArena Multi-Turn10531314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than o1-mini?

o1-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or o1-mini better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and o1-mini share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper