Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 29.0.
  • Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Muse Spark specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index30.850.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Coding10901481
SciCode—51.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts10731474
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Math11171455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Expert10641457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English10331464
LMArena Chinese10701509
LMArena Russian10451466
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following10561442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query10701451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMuse Spark
LMArena Text10801474
LMArena Creative Writing10461459
LMArena Multi-Turn10531477

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Muse Spark share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper