Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Mistral Large 3

Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Mistral Large 3 Mistral AI

39.1

Rank #176 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Large 3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Large 3 leads 60.0 to 29.6.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral Large 3 specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index30.839.1
Released—2025-12-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$0.75
Results tracked1324

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Mistral Large 3: 34.4 (#237)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Coding10901448
LMArena WebDev—1230
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Mistral Large 3: 15.2 (#319)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Hard Prompts10731429
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—7.5%
Thematic Generalization—23%

Math Mistral Large 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Mistral Large 3: 38.7 (#129)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Math11171414

Knowledge Mistral Large 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Mistral Large 3: 36.0 (#177)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Expert10641421
Vectara Hallucination Rate—14.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Mistral Large 3: 38.2 (#66)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Vision—1221

Multilingual Mistral Large 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Mistral Large 3: 52.5 (#84)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Non-English10331413
LMArena Chinese10701447
LMArena Russian10451411
LMArena French—1455
LMArena German—1437
LMArena Japanese—1394
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Spanish—1440

Instruction Following Mistral Large 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Mistral Large 3: 74.0 (#108)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Instruction Following10561403

Long Context Mistral Large 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Mistral Large 3: 43.1 (#105)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Longer Query10701413

Writing & Preference Mistral Large 3 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Mistral Large 3: 60.0 (#101)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMistral Large 3
LMArena Text10801428
LMArena Creative Writing10461386
LMArena Multi-Turn10531429
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1412

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Mistral Large 3?

Mistral Large 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Mistral Large 3 better for coding?

Mistral Large 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Mistral Large 3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large 3 has 24.

Related comparisons

Go deeper