Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs MiniMax-M2.5

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.2

Rank #284 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.1

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 54.1 to 29.8.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and MiniMax-M2.5 specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
ProviderIBMMiniMax
Noometry Index30.238.1
Released—2026-02-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.8 (#311), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Coding10901380
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
LMArena WebDev—1386
SWE-bench Multilingual—68.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%—
ALE-Bench—618.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
Terminal-Bench—42.7%
Vending-Bench 2—-23.16

Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 19.6 (#234), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts10731372
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—16.8%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.68

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.7 (#215), MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Math11171378
ProofBench—4%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.4 (#238), MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Expert10641378
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.1%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.1 (#273), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Non-English10331338
LMArena Chinese10701392
LMArena Russian10451359
LMArena French—1363
LMArena German—1361
LMArena Japanese—1169
LMArena Korean—1232
LMArena Spanish—1354

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 54.2 (#279), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Instruction Following10561353

Long Context MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#263), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Longer Query10711367
CL-bench—11.4%
CL-bench Life—6.3%

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.8 (#287), MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Text10801359
LMArena Creative Writing10461331
LMArena Multi-Turn10531364
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1361

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than MiniMax-M2.5?

MiniMax-M2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 27.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper