Model comparison
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 3 categories and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads 47.6 to 29.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and 46.9% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct.
Side by side
| Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 30.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-06 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.32 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | 46.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1268 |
| SciCode | — | 26% |
| WeirdML | — | 14.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 57.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 31.9% |
| BALROG | — | 23% |
Reasoning Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1257 |
| SimpleBench | — | 19.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 50.8% |
| DTBench | — | 59.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 127.33 |
| ForecastBench | — | 58.6 |
| LiveBench | — | 50.2% |
Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1267 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 5.1% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 42.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 41.6% |
Knowledge Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | 1225 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 22.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.1% |
| MMLU | — | 86.3% |
Multilingual Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1217 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | 1252 |
| LMArena French | — | 1281 |
| LMArena German | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1150 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1143 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1270 |
Instruction Following Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1242 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 82.7% |
Long Context Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1070 | 1256 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 33.3% |
Writing & Preference Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1280 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 39.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct?
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 30.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct better for coding?
Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.0 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43.