Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Llama 3.1-70B

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-70B Meta

29.6

Rank #308 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads 32.2 to 13.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and 46.1% for Llama 3.1-70B.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Llama 3.1-70B specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index30.829.6
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1335

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%46.1%
LMArena Coding10901260
WeirdML—9%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
TheAgentCompany—6.9%
BALROG—27.9%

Reasoning Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts10731241
DTBench—60%
LMCA—14.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.92

Math Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Math11171252
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.6%
Omni-MATH—21%
MATH Level 5—36.7%

Knowledge Granite 3.0 2b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Expert10641209
GPQA Diamond—44.2%
MMLU-Pro—65.3%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
MMLU—80.1%

Multilingual Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Non-English10331219
LMArena Chinese10701215
LMArena Russian10451234
LMArena French—1261
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1132
LMArena Korean—1140
LMArena Spanish—1253

Instruction Following Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Instruction Following10561231
IFEval—82.1%

Long Context Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Longer Query10701241

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1-70B leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructLlama 3.1-70B
LMArena Text10801261
LMArena Creative Writing10461232
LMArena Multi-Turn10531256
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—784
WildBench—75.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Llama 3.1-70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.3 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Llama 3.1-70B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper