Model comparison
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 50.2 to 29.6.
- Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 39.6 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1090 | 1319 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 20.5% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1073 | 1308 |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1117 | 1273 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1064 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1033 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1070 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1045 | 1305 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1056 | 1278 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1070 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.0 2b Instruct | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1080 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1046 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1053 | 1303 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.