Model comparison

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct IBM

30.8

Rank #286 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 8 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 20.5% for Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and 29.3% for Granite 3.0 8b Instruct.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
Granite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderIBMIBM
Noometry Index30.831.6
Released——
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 28.3 (#316), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct20.5%29.3%
LMArena Coding10901112
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%

Reasoning Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 20.5 (#235), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10731092

Math Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.2 (#217), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math11171143

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.0 (#241), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert10641087

Multilingual Too close to call

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 27.0 (#278), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English10331037
LMArena Chinese10701063
LMArena Russian10451060

Instruction Following Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 53.9 (#284), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10561088

Long Context Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 32.5 (#268), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10701122

Writing & Preference Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct: 29.6 (#292), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 2b InstructGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text10801096
LMArena Creative Writing10461071
LMArena Multi-Turn10531063

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.8 vs 31.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 3.0 2b Instruct or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.7 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 2b Instruct and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 2b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper