Noometry

Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 35.5.
  • gpt-oss-20b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index32.541.3
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding13061361
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts12741374
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.82—

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math13171359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert12581339
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English12681363
LMArena Chinese13141417
LMArena German12551355
LMArena Japanese12441342
LMArena Korean12361351
LMArena Russian12781368
LMArena French—1391
LMArena Spanish1267—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following12361344
IFEval73.2%—

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query12501366

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text12871377
LMArena Creative Writing12011359
LMArena Multi-Turn12681387
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper