Model comparison

gpt-oss-20b vs Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-20b OpenAI

32.5

Rank #255 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-20b scores higher in 2 categories and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 48.7 to 35.5.
  • gpt-oss-20b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

gpt-oss-20b and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 specifications
gpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
ProviderOpenAITencent
Noometry Index32.538.6
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.018—
Output $ / M tokens$0.09—
Results tracked3412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 37.6 (#192), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding13061307
SciCode34.4%—
WeirdML40.9%—
ALE-Bench566.05—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-20b: 9.3 (#154), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
Terminal-Bench3.4%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 19.3 (#261), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts12741286
Kagi LLM Benchmark53.2%—
CritPt1.4%—
Chess Puzzles4%—
DTBench68%—
LMCA14.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index137.82—

Math gpt-oss-20b leads

gpt-oss-20b: 39.4 (#103), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Math13171281
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202565.3%—
Omni-MATH56.5%—

Knowledge Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 34.6 (#195), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert12581276
GPQA Diamond60.8%—
MMLU-Pro74%—
GPQA (HELM)59.4%—

Multilingual Too close to call

gpt-oss-20b: 42.2 (#197), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English12681265
LMArena Chinese13141346
LMArena Russian12781266
LMArena German1255—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1236—
LMArena Spanish1267—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 61.8 (#240), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following12361277
IFEval73.2%—

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 37.9 (#209), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query12501341

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

gpt-oss-20b: 35.5 (#265), Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-20bHunyuan Large 2025 02 10
LMArena Text12871288
LMArena Creative Writing12011264
LMArena Multi-Turn12681284
EQ-Bench Creative Writing666—
WildBench73.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-20b better than Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-20b or Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 38.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-20b and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-20b has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper