Model comparison

gpt-oss-120b vs Mercury

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

gpt-oss-120b OpenAI

36.3

Rank #217 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. gpt-oss-120b scores higher in 4 categories and Mercury in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Mercury leads 38.4 to 31.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 58.6% for gpt-oss-120b and 21.6% for Mercury.
  • gpt-oss-120b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

gpt-oss-120b and Mercury specifications
gpt-oss-120bMercury
ProviderOpenAIInception
Noometry Index36.337.6
Released2025-08-05—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output41K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.037—
Output $ / M tokens$0.17—
Results tracked489

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

gpt-oss-120b: 33.5 (#256), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
LMArena Coding13801322
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)26%—
Aider Polyglot41.8%—
SciCode36%—
WeirdML48.2%—
ALE-Bench575.62—
AlgoTune1.41—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

gpt-oss-120b: 12.2 (#153), Mercury: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
Terminal-Bench18.7%—
APEX-Agents4.4%—
METR Time Horizons56.6%—
Vending-Bench 2-21.53—

Reasoning gpt-oss-120b leads

gpt-oss-120b: 20.0 (#245), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
Kagi LLM Benchmark58.6%21.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts13641285
SimpleBench22.1%—
CritPt1.1%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
Mystery Game Puzzles2%—
DTBench76.3%—
LMCA22.1%—
Surface Evolver Bench25%—
Epoch Capabilities Index139.93—

Math Not comparable

gpt-oss-120b: 52.5 (#50), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
Omni-MATH68.8%—
LMArena Math1389—

Knowledge Not comparable

gpt-oss-120b: 42.4 (#96), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro79.5%—
Confabulations15.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate14.2%—
GPQA (HELM)68.4%—
LMArena Expert1356—

Multilingual gpt-oss-120b leads

gpt-oss-120b: 48.0 (#147), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
LMArena Non-English13511260
LMArena Chinese1385—
LMArena French1369—
LMArena German1353—
LMArena Japanese1331—
LMArena Korean1282—
LMArena Russian1343—
LMArena Spanish1389—

Instruction Following gpt-oss-120b leads

gpt-oss-120b: 69.3 (#173), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
LMArena Instruction Following13181239
IFEval83.6%—

Long Context Mercury leads

gpt-oss-120b: 31.4 (#278), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
LMArena Longer Query13191266
Fiction.LiveBench44.4%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

gpt-oss-120b: 46.5 (#217), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkgpt-oss-120bMercury
LMArena Text13651282
LMArena Creative Writing12751191
LMArena Multi-Turn13401282
Short-Story Creative Writing77.1%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing961—
WildBench84.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is gpt-oss-120b better than Mercury?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is gpt-oss-120b or Mercury better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do gpt-oss-120b and Mercury share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. gpt-oss-120b has 48 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper