Model comparison

GPT-6 Sol vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.8

Rank #322 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-6 Sol scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 30.4.
  • Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-6 Sol and Qwen1.5 4b Chat specifications
GPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index61.828.8
Released2026-09-22—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$10—
Results tracked4513

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 29.1 (#308)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1447999
DeepSWE68.8%—
FrontierCode49.3%—
LMArena WebDev1688—
SciCode57.6%—
ALE-Bench2,462—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
APEX-Agents54.3%—
GDP.pdf26.4%—
Vending-Bench 214,428—

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 18.5 (#279)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1418976
ARC-AGI-289.6%—
NYT Connections (extended)90.1%—
ARC-AGI-195.5%—
CritPt30.9%—
EBR-Bench53.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles56%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA59.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index162.72—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.4 (#234)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math14021026
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)89.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 490%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025100%—
ProofBench83%—

Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.7 (#255)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1439980
GPQA Diamond94.3%—
SimpleQA Verified60.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Vision1245—
Blueprint-Bench 236.9%—
Furniture Assembly58.3%—

Multilingual GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.1 (#290)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1385979
LMArena Chinese14051024
LMArena German1390902
LMArena Russian1401952
LMArena French1410—
LMArena Japanese1385—
LMArena Korean1341—
LMArena Spanish1384—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.0 (#300)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1412978

Long Context GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#290)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1411988

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Sol leads

GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.8 (#309)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 SolQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1395997
LMArena Creative Writing1378969
LMArena Multi-Turn1412977
EQ-Bench Creative Writing2125—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Sol better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-6 Sol or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Sol and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Sol has 45 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper