Model comparison

GPT-6 Luna vs Sonar

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-6 Luna OpenAI

53.3

Rank #36 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Luna leads 76.1 to 33.7.
  • GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.50 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • GPT-6 Luna accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

GPT-6 Luna and Sonar specifications
GPT-6 LunaSonar
ProviderOpenAIPerplexity
Noometry Index53.338.5
Released2026-09-222024-01-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M128K
Max output128K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.10$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.50$1
Results tracked427

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 55.5 (#25), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
DeepSWE66.6%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1581—
SciCode54.6%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1439—
ALE-Bench1,577—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 33.3 (#54), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
APEX-Agents44.3%—
GDP.pdf23%—

Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 48.2 (#41), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
ARC-AGI-259.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)68.7%—
ARC-AGI-186.7%—
CritPt19.4%—
Chess Puzzles31%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1411—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench90.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
LMCA44.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.28—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 76.1 (#15), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)78.9%—
FrontierMath Tier 456.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.9%—
ProofBench64%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1416—

Knowledge Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 57.0 (#41), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
GPQA Diamond90.5%—
SimpleQA Verified41.4%—
LMArena Expert1444—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 42.4 (#30), Sonar: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
LMArena Vision1217—
Blueprint-Bench 231.2%—
Furniture Assembly44.2%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 50.5 (#117), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
LMArena Non-English1386—
LMArena Chinese1433—
LMArena French1420—
LMArena German1369—
LMArena Japanese1369—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Russian1394—
LMArena Spanish1393—

Instruction Following GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 74.3 (#99), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1409—

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-6 Luna: 43.0 (#111), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
LMArena Longer Query1409—

Writing & Preference GPT-6 Luna leads

GPT-6 Luna: 58.3 (#119), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-6 LunaSonar
LMArena Text1391—
LMArena Creative Writing1363—
LMArena Multi-Turn1396—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-6 Luna better than Sonar?

GPT-6 Luna is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.3 to 38.5 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Luna or Sonar?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is GPT-6 Luna or Sonar better for coding?

GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-6 Luna does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 42 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper