Model comparison
GPT-6 Luna vs Ring-2.6-1T
GPT-6 Luna has enough public results to be ranked (#65); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GPT-6 Luna leads 54.7 to 40.1.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 45.1 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2026-09-22 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 54.7 (#24), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | 66.6% | — |
| FrontierCode | 42.4% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1583 | — |
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1448 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning GPT-6 Luna leads
GPT-6 Luna: 31.7 (#68), Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 68.7% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1415 | — |
Math Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 35.6 (#140), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 40.1 (#110), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1458 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 42.0 (#27), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Furniture Assembly | 44.2% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 51.0 (#111), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 74.7 (#85), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1414 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 43.3 (#95), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1417 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-6 Luna: 58.4 (#115), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | GPT-6 Luna | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1357 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1400 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-6 Luna better than Ring-2.6-1T?
GPT-6 Luna has enough public results to be ranked (#65); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is GPT-6 Luna or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
GPT-6 Luna scores higher on coding benchmarks: 54.7 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-6 Luna and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-6 Luna has 18 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.